HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
The two processors being compared are the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 710F. Both processors have similar specifications, indicating that they are closely related.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have the same architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This configuration provides a balance between high-performance and power efficiency.
Additionally, both processors have 8 cores, giving them the ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously. This is beneficial for multitasking and running demanding applications smoothly.
Both processors also support the ARMv8-A instruction set. This instruction set is widely used in modern processors and ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of manufacturing process, both processors have a lithography of 12 nm. This indicates that they are fabricated using a more advanced and efficient manufacturing process compared to older processors.
Furthermore, both processors have 5500 million transistors. Transistors are crucial components that help in performing calculations and executing instructions in a processor. The higher the number of transistors, the more powerful and efficient the processor tends to be.
Lastly, both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) rating of 5 watts. TDP represents the maximum amount of heat dissipation required to operate the processor at its full potential. A lower TDP indicates better power efficiency and less heat generation, which is crucial for mobile devices.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 710F share similar specifications, suggesting that they are closely related. These processors provide a balance between performance and power efficiency, making them suitable for a wide range of mobile devices.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have the same architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This configuration provides a balance between high-performance and power efficiency.
Additionally, both processors have 8 cores, giving them the ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously. This is beneficial for multitasking and running demanding applications smoothly.
Both processors also support the ARMv8-A instruction set. This instruction set is widely used in modern processors and ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of manufacturing process, both processors have a lithography of 12 nm. This indicates that they are fabricated using a more advanced and efficient manufacturing process compared to older processors.
Furthermore, both processors have 5500 million transistors. Transistors are crucial components that help in performing calculations and executing instructions in a processor. The higher the number of transistors, the more powerful and efficient the processor tends to be.
Lastly, both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) rating of 5 watts. TDP represents the maximum amount of heat dissipation required to operate the processor at its full potential. A lower TDP indicates better power efficiency and less heat generation, which is crucial for mobile devices.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 710F share similar specifications, suggesting that they are closely related. These processors provide a balance between performance and power efficiency, making them suitable for a wide range of mobile devices.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 5500 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 64 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2019 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi6260 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 2400
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
8
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
9
Unisoc SC7731E vs Samsung Exynos 9825
10
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500s