HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and HiSilicon Kirin 710A are two processors that appear to be quite similar in their specifications. However, there are a few key differences that set them apart.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core design with four Cortex-A73 cores and four Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed with 2.2 GHz for the Cortex-A73 cores and 1.7 GHz for the Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 710A has a slightly lower clock speed with 2.0 GHz for the Cortex-A73 cores and 1.7 GHz for the Cortex-A53 cores. This indicates that the Kirin 710 may offer slightly better performance in terms of raw processing power.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 710 is built using a 12 nm process, while the Kirin 710A is built using a slightly older 14 nm process. Generally, a smaller lithography results in better energy efficiency and improved performance due to smaller transistor sizes. However, the difference between 12 nm and 14 nm is minimal in terms of overall performance.
In terms of the number of transistors, both processors have 5500 million transistors. This means that they have a similar level of complexity and potential for performance.
Finally, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts, indicating that they have the same power consumption and heat generation.
Overall, while the Kirin 710 and Kirin 710A share many similarities, the Kirin 710 may offer slightly better performance due to its higher clock speed. However, this difference may not be noticeable in everyday usage scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may come down to other factors such as device compatibility or pricing.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature an octa-core design with four Cortex-A73 cores and four Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 710 has a higher clock speed with 2.2 GHz for the Cortex-A73 cores and 1.7 GHz for the Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 710A has a slightly lower clock speed with 2.0 GHz for the Cortex-A73 cores and 1.7 GHz for the Cortex-A53 cores. This indicates that the Kirin 710 may offer slightly better performance in terms of raw processing power.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 710 is built using a 12 nm process, while the Kirin 710A is built using a slightly older 14 nm process. Generally, a smaller lithography results in better energy efficiency and improved performance due to smaller transistor sizes. However, the difference between 12 nm and 14 nm is minimal in terms of overall performance.
In terms of the number of transistors, both processors have 5500 million transistors. This means that they have a similar level of complexity and potential for performance.
Finally, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts, indicating that they have the same power consumption and heat generation.
Overall, while the Kirin 710 and Kirin 710A share many similarities, the Kirin 710 may offer slightly better performance due to its higher clock speed. However, this difference may not be noticeable in everyday usage scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may come down to other factors such as device compatibility or pricing.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 5500 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 64 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi6260 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Apple A13 Bionic
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4
Apple A12 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G95
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
8
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
10
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Unisoc Tiger T606