MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors that offer different specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, for a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which makes a total of 4 cores.
As for the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, the latest version of the ARM architecture.
The Unisoc Tiger T618 uses a 12nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 uses a more advanced 7nm process. Smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Both processors have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 watts, which means they consume the same amount of power under normal conditions.
Also, both processors are equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is supposed to handle artificial intelligence tasks and improve overall performance in AI-related applications.
Looking at the specifications, we can see that the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a higher number of CPU cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 uses a more advanced 7nm lithography that may offer better efficiency and performance. The choice between the two processors may depend on the user's specific needs and priorities, such as the desired balance between energy efficiency and processing power.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, for a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which makes a total of 4 cores.
As for the instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, the latest version of the ARM architecture.
The Unisoc Tiger T618 uses a 12nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 uses a more advanced 7nm process. Smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Both processors have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 watts, which means they consume the same amount of power under normal conditions.
Also, both processors are equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is supposed to handle artificial intelligence tasks and improve overall performance in AI-related applications.
Looking at the specifications, we can see that the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a higher number of CPU cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 uses a more advanced 7nm lithography that may offer better efficiency and performance. The choice between the two processors may depend on the user's specific needs and priorities, such as the desired balance between energy efficiency and processing power.
Prozessor Kerne und Architektur
Architektur | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Zahl der Kerne | 4 | 8 |
Befehlssatz | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithographie | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neuronale Verarbeitung | NPU | NPU |
Arbeitsspeicher (RAM)
Maximaler Speicher | bis zu 16 GB | bis zu 6 GB |
Speichertyp | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Speicherfrequenz | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Speicherbus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Speicher
Speichertechnologie | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Grafik
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU-Architektur | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU-Taktfrequenz | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Ausführung Einheiten | 4 | 2 |
Shader | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Kamera, Video, Display
Max. Bildschirmauflösung | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max. Kameraauflösung | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max. Videoaufnahme | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video-Codec-Unterstützung | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G-Netz | Ja | Ja |
5G-Netz | Ja | Ja |
Spitzen-Download-Geschwindigkeit | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Spitzen-Upload-Geschwindigkeit | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellitennavigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Ergänzende Informationen
Datum der Einführung | 2020 Quartal 2 | 2019 August |
Teilenummer | MT6873, MT6873V | T618 |
Vertikales Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positionierung | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Gesamtpunktzahl
GeekBench 6 Einzelkern
Punktzahl
GeekBench 6 Mehrkern
Punktzahl
Beliebte Vergleiche:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
3
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Samsung Exynos 7420
4
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
5
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Helio G85
6
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Apple A12 Bionic
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200