Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and Tiger T710 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Tiger T700, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 cores, making it a powerful processor. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. The lithography is 12 nm, which indicates that it is manufactured using a 12 nanometer process. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 10 watts, which is a measure of the maximum amount of heat generated during operation.
Moving on to the Tiger T710, it has a slightly different CPU architecture compared to the T700. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T700, it also has a total of 8 cores. The instruction set is the same, ARMv8.2-A. The lithography is also 12 nm, which indicates the same manufacturing process. However, one notable difference is the presence of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances the processor's capability to handle machine learning and AI tasks.
In comparing the two processors, some similarities and differences can be observed. Both processors have the same instruction set, architecture, and lithography. However, the T710 has a more balanced CPU architecture with an equal number of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, it includes the Dual NPU, which gives it an advantage in terms of handling AI and machine learning tasks.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and T710 are similar in many ways, but the T710 offers some enhancements such as a more balanced CPU architecture and the inclusion of Dual NPU. Depending on the requirements of the user, these specifications may be important factors to consider when choosing between the two processors.
Starting with the Tiger T700, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 cores, making it a powerful processor. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. The lithography is 12 nm, which indicates that it is manufactured using a 12 nanometer process. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 10 watts, which is a measure of the maximum amount of heat generated during operation.
Moving on to the Tiger T710, it has a slightly different CPU architecture compared to the T700. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T700, it also has a total of 8 cores. The instruction set is the same, ARMv8.2-A. The lithography is also 12 nm, which indicates the same manufacturing process. However, one notable difference is the presence of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances the processor's capability to handle machine learning and AI tasks.
In comparing the two processors, some similarities and differences can be observed. Both processors have the same instruction set, architecture, and lithography. However, the T710 has a more balanced CPU architecture with an equal number of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, it includes the Dual NPU, which gives it an advantage in terms of handling AI and machine learning tasks.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and T710 are similar in many ways, but the T710 offers some enhancements such as a more balanced CPU architecture and the inclusion of Dual NPU. Depending on the requirements of the user, these specifications may be important factors to consider when choosing between the two processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 March | 2019 |
Partnumber | T700 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
2
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
3
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
4
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
5
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
6
Apple A9 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
7
MediaTek Helio G91 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
9
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Helio G95