Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and Tiger T710 processors both have their own unique set of specifications.
Starting with the Tiger T618, it features a variety of CPU cores and architecture. The architecture comprises 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. These processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography of the T618 is 12 nm, and it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced neural computing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Tiger T710 also possesses its own distinguishing features. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which amount to a total of 8 cores, similar to the T618. Like its counterpart, the T710 also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and possesses a lithography of 12 nm. However, instead of a single NPU, the T710 includes a Dual NPU for more advanced neural processing.
When comparing these two processors, it is evident that they share several similarities. Both the T618 and T710 have identical number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, their primary point of differentiation lies in their CPU architecture and neural processing capabilities. The T618 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the T710 incorporates the same cores but with lower clock speeds. Additionally, the T618 boasts a single NPU, whereas the T710 stands out with its Dual NPU functionality.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities. If a higher clock speed and a single NPU are desired, the T618 would be the more suitable option. However, if dual NPUs and overall processing power are of greater importance, the T710 would be the preferred choice.
Starting with the Tiger T618, it features a variety of CPU cores and architecture. The architecture comprises 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. These processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography of the T618 is 12 nm, and it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced neural computing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Tiger T710 also possesses its own distinguishing features. Its architecture consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which amount to a total of 8 cores, similar to the T618. Like its counterpart, the T710 also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and possesses a lithography of 12 nm. However, instead of a single NPU, the T710 includes a Dual NPU for more advanced neural processing.
When comparing these two processors, it is evident that they share several similarities. Both the T618 and T710 have identical number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, their primary point of differentiation lies in their CPU architecture and neural processing capabilities. The T618 features Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the T710 incorporates the same cores but with lower clock speeds. Additionally, the T618 boasts a single NPU, whereas the T710 stands out with its Dual NPU functionality.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities. If a higher clock speed and a single NPU are desired, the T618 would be the more suitable option. However, if dual NPUs and overall processing power are of greater importance, the T710 would be the preferred choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64M | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 August | 2019 |
Partnumber | T618 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
3
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
4
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Apple A11 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Google Tensor G2
10
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200