Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 are two processors offered by Unisoc, a leading semiconductor company. Despite having similar specifications, they do have some notable differences.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features a 12nm lithography and is equipped with 8 CPU cores. Its architecture comprises 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This combination provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a maximum thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. Additionally, it boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Comparing it to the Unisoc Tiger T700, we find similar specifications. Both processors have 8 CPU cores and operate on a 12nm lithography. However, the T700 has a slightly lower clock speed, with its 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and its 6 Cortex-A55 cores also operating at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the T618 may have a slight advantage in terms of overall performance.
In terms of instruction set support, both processors are equipped with ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest applications and software. Additionally, both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, indicating that they are designed to be power-efficient for mobile devices.
One significant difference between the two processors is that the Unisoc Tiger T618 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated AI processing unit can accelerate AI-related tasks, such as image recognition or voice command processing. The absence of an NPU in the T700 may limit its capabilities in artificial intelligence applications.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 share many similarities in terms of their specifications, the T618 has a slightly higher clock speed and the added advantage of a dedicated Neural Processing Unit. These differences make the T618 more suitable for demanding tasks and AI-related applications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features a 12nm lithography and is equipped with 8 CPU cores. Its architecture comprises 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This combination provides a good balance between performance and power efficiency. The processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a maximum thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. Additionally, it boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Comparing it to the Unisoc Tiger T700, we find similar specifications. Both processors have 8 CPU cores and operate on a 12nm lithography. However, the T700 has a slightly lower clock speed, with its 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and its 6 Cortex-A55 cores also operating at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the T618 may have a slight advantage in terms of overall performance.
In terms of instruction set support, both processors are equipped with ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest applications and software. Additionally, both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, indicating that they are designed to be power-efficient for mobile devices.
One significant difference between the two processors is that the Unisoc Tiger T618 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated AI processing unit can accelerate AI-related tasks, such as image recognition or voice command processing. The absence of an NPU in the T700 may limit its capabilities in artificial intelligence applications.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 share many similarities in terms of their specifications, the T618 has a slightly higher clock speed and the added advantage of a dedicated Neural Processing Unit. These differences make the T618 more suitable for demanding tasks and AI-related applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shaders | 32 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64M | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 August | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | T618 | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
2
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 8890
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
5
Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
9
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio P35
10
Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9609