Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and T710 are two processors with similar specifications but differ in some key areas.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have eight cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which indicates a high level of compatibility and performance. However, there is a difference in the architecture configuration. The T616 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the T710 has four Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This difference in core distribution may result in varying levels of performance in various tasks.
Both processors share the same lithography process at 12 nm, indicating efficient power consumption and thermal management. However, the T710 offers an additional feature, namely dual Neural Processing Units (NPU). This means the T710 has dedicated hardware designed specifically for AI and machine learning tasks, which can potentially enhance the performance of applications that utilize these technologies.
Another aspect to consider is the power consumption. The T616 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating its power efficiency. Unfortunately, this information is not provided for the T710, making it difficult to directly compare power consumption between the two processors.
In summary, while both processors have the same number of cores and use the same instruction set, the T616 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A75 cores compared to the T710. The T710, however, stands out with its dual NPUs, offering potential benefits for AI and machine learning tasks. It would be beneficial to further analyze real-world performance benchmarks and power consumption data to make a more informed comparison between these two processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have eight cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which indicates a high level of compatibility and performance. However, there is a difference in the architecture configuration. The T616 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the T710 has four Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This difference in core distribution may result in varying levels of performance in various tasks.
Both processors share the same lithography process at 12 nm, indicating efficient power consumption and thermal management. However, the T710 offers an additional feature, namely dual Neural Processing Units (NPU). This means the T710 has dedicated hardware designed specifically for AI and machine learning tasks, which can potentially enhance the performance of applications that utilize these technologies.
Another aspect to consider is the power consumption. The T616 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating its power efficiency. Unfortunately, this information is not provided for the T710, making it difficult to directly compare power consumption between the two processors.
In summary, while both processors have the same number of cores and use the same instruction set, the T616 has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A75 cores compared to the T710. The T710, however, stands out with its dual NPUs, offering potential benefits for AI and machine learning tasks. It would be beneficial to further analyze real-world performance benchmarks and power consumption data to make a more informed comparison between these two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T616 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Apple A15 Bionic
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc SC7731E
5
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
7
Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Helio G25
8
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 980