Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and Unisoc Tiger T700 are both processors designed by Unisoc. While they share similarities in terms of their architecture, instruction set, lithography, and TDP, there are a few key differences that set them apart.
Starting with the architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is equipped with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, which provide a higher clock speed compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700's 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This means that the T616 may have a slight advantage in terms of processing power and overall performance.
In terms of the remaining cores, both processors have 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which means that they are equal in this aspect. The Cortex-A55 cores are designed for efficiency and power saving, which is beneficial for prolonging the battery life of devices powered by these processors.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications, providing a seamless user experience.
Additionally, both the T616 and T700 have the same lithography, which is 12 nm. This indicates that both processors are manufactured using the same process technology, ensuring efficient performance and power consumption.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for both processors is 10 Watt, indicating that they have the same power consumption and heat dissipation characteristics.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T616 and Unisoc Tiger T700 share many similarities in terms of their specifications. However, the T616 has a slightly higher clock speed in its Cortex-A75 cores, potentially offering better performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application they will be used in.
Starting with the architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is equipped with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, which provide a higher clock speed compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700's 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This means that the T616 may have a slight advantage in terms of processing power and overall performance.
In terms of the remaining cores, both processors have 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which means that they are equal in this aspect. The Cortex-A55 cores are designed for efficiency and power saving, which is beneficial for prolonging the battery life of devices powered by these processors.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications, providing a seamless user experience.
Additionally, both the T616 and T700 have the same lithography, which is 12 nm. This indicates that both processors are manufactured using the same process technology, ensuring efficient performance and power consumption.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for both processors is 10 Watt, indicating that they have the same power consumption and heat dissipation characteristics.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T616 and Unisoc Tiger T700 share many similarities in terms of their specifications. However, the T616 has a slightly higher clock speed in its Cortex-A75 cores, potentially offering better performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 16 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | T616 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Apple A10X Fusion
3
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 980
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
7
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
8
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Apple A13 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio G95