Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors with similar specifications but a few key differences. Both processors have 8 cores and are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also share the same lithography technology, 12 nm, and have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. However, the two processors differ in terms of their CPU cores and architecture.
The Unisoc Tiger T618 features a CPU architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a balance between power and efficiency, with the Cortex-A75 cores offering high-performance capabilities for demanding tasks, while the Cortex-A55 cores handle lighter tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 also consists of a CPU architecture that includes 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. However, it differs in terms of the remaining 6 cores, which are 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Compared to the T618, the T616 has slightly lower clock speeds for the Cortex-A55 cores, which could result in slightly reduced performance for tasks that rely on these cores.
In addition to their CPU architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has an additional feature – a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling artificial intelligence (AI) tasks, such as image recognition, natural language processing, and machine learning. The NPU enables faster and more efficient execution of AI-related processes, making the T618 more suitable for AI-powered applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are similar in many aspects, such as their number of cores, instruction sets, lithography, and TDP, the T618 outperforms the T616 in terms of its CPU architecture and the inclusion of an NPU. These differences make the T618 a more capable processor, particularly for tasks that involve AI processing.
The Unisoc Tiger T618 features a CPU architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a balance between power and efficiency, with the Cortex-A75 cores offering high-performance capabilities for demanding tasks, while the Cortex-A55 cores handle lighter tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 also consists of a CPU architecture that includes 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. However, it differs in terms of the remaining 6 cores, which are 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Compared to the T618, the T616 has slightly lower clock speeds for the Cortex-A55 cores, which could result in slightly reduced performance for tasks that rely on these cores.
In addition to their CPU architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has an additional feature – a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling artificial intelligence (AI) tasks, such as image recognition, natural language processing, and machine learning. The NPU enables faster and more efficient execution of AI-related processes, making the T618 more suitable for AI-powered applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T616 are similar in many aspects, such as their number of cores, instruction sets, lithography, and TDP, the T618 outperforms the T616 in terms of its CPU architecture and the inclusion of an NPU. These differences make the T618 a more capable processor, particularly for tasks that involve AI processing.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 2 |
| Shaders | 16 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 64M |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 | 2019 August |
| Partnumber | T616 | T618 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Helio G50
3
MediaTek Helio G100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio A25
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
8
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
9
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Helio P35
10
Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960