Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and Tiger T612 are two processors that offer different specifications for various computing needs. Starting with the Tiger T618, this processor features an architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores in all. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a power consumption of 10 Watts, it is designed to be energy-efficient. Additionally, the Tiger T618 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
On the other hand, the Tiger T612 also boasts an 8-core configuration, but with a slightly lower clock speed. It houses 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T618, it employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Moreover, the power consumption remains the same at 10 Watts. However, it lacks the NPU present in the Tiger T618, potentially limiting its performance in AI and ML applications.
In terms of performance, the higher clock speed of the Tiger T618's Cortex-A75 cores may provide a slight advantage in tasks that require single-threaded performance. The NPU in the Tiger T618 can significantly improve AI and ML processing, giving it an edge in such workloads compared to the Tiger T612. However, for multi-threaded workloads, both processors offer similar capabilities with their Cortex-A55 cores.
Overall, if your requirements involve AI and ML tasks, the Tiger T618 with its NPU and higher clock speed would be the more suitable choice. However, if these specific workloads are not a priority, the Tiger T612 presents a more budget-friendly option without compromising on general computing performance. Consider your needs and budget to make an informed decision between these two processors.
On the other hand, the Tiger T612 also boasts an 8-core configuration, but with a slightly lower clock speed. It houses 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T618, it employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Moreover, the power consumption remains the same at 10 Watts. However, it lacks the NPU present in the Tiger T618, potentially limiting its performance in AI and ML applications.
In terms of performance, the higher clock speed of the Tiger T618's Cortex-A75 cores may provide a slight advantage in tasks that require single-threaded performance. The NPU in the Tiger T618 can significantly improve AI and ML processing, giving it an edge in such workloads compared to the Tiger T612. However, for multi-threaded workloads, both processors offer similar capabilities with their Cortex-A55 cores.
Overall, if your requirements involve AI and ML tasks, the Tiger T618 with its NPU and higher clock speed would be the more suitable choice. However, if these specific workloads are not a priority, the Tiger T612 presents a more budget-friendly option without compromising on general computing performance. Consider your needs and budget to make an informed decision between these two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 16 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 50MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 January | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T612 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
2
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc SC7731E
3
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Apple A16 Bionic
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
5
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Helio G95
8
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680