Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and Tiger T618 are two processors from Unisoc that have slightly different specifications. Both processors have the same number of cores, architecture, and instruction set, but there are some slight differences to note.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T618 has slightly higher clock speeds compared to the Tiger T610, which could result in improved performance.
Both processors have a lithography of 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors on the processors. This smaller size generally enables better power efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating their power consumption.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Tiger T618. This NPU is responsible for performing artificial intelligence-related tasks, which can enhance the overall performance and capabilities of the processor. The Tiger T610, however, does not have this feature.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 and Tiger T618 have many similarities such as architecture, instruction set, lithography, and power consumption, there are a few differences. The Tiger T618 has slightly higher clock speeds and includes a Neural Processing Unit, which can provide better performance and added AI capabilities compared to the Tiger T610.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T618 has slightly higher clock speeds compared to the Tiger T610, which could result in improved performance.
Both processors have a lithography of 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors on the processors. This smaller size generally enables better power efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating their power consumption.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Tiger T618. This NPU is responsible for performing artificial intelligence-related tasks, which can enhance the overall performance and capabilities of the processor. The Tiger T610, however, does not have this feature.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 and Tiger T618 have many similarities such as architecture, instruction set, lithography, and power consumption, there are a few differences. The Tiger T618 has slightly higher clock speeds and includes a Neural Processing Unit, which can provide better performance and added AI capabilities compared to the Tiger T610.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 614.4 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shaders | 32 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP | 1x 64M |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 June | 2019 August |
| Partnumber | T610 | T618 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
2
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
3
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
5
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
6
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U