Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors have similar specifications but differ slightly in CPU clock speeds. Both processors are built on a 12 nm lithography process and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same number of cores, i.e., 8 cores.
The key difference lies in their CPU architecture and clock speeds. The Tiger T610 features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 boasts a slightly faster CPU architecture with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
This difference in clock speeds may result in some performance variation between the two processors. The Tiger T616 may have a slight advantage in CPU-intensive tasks due to its slightly higher clock speed. However, in everyday usage, the difference may not be noticeable to the average user.
Another significant aspect to consider is the thermal design power (TDP), which is the amount of power the processor dissipates as heat. Both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power and generate similar levels of heat when operating at their maximum performance levels.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors offer similar features and performance with subtle differences in clock speeds. The decision between the two will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, as well as the devices they are considering for usage.
The key difference lies in their CPU architecture and clock speeds. The Tiger T610 features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 boasts a slightly faster CPU architecture with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
This difference in clock speeds may result in some performance variation between the two processors. The Tiger T616 may have a slight advantage in CPU-intensive tasks due to its slightly higher clock speed. However, in everyday usage, the difference may not be noticeable to the average user.
Another significant aspect to consider is the thermal design power (TDP), which is the amount of power the processor dissipates as heat. Both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power and generate similar levels of heat when operating at their maximum performance levels.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors offer similar features and performance with subtle differences in clock speeds. The decision between the two will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, as well as the devices they are considering for usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 614.4 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 June | 2021 |
Partnumber | T610 | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
5
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
7
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A11 Bionic
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820