Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors have similar specifications but differ slightly in CPU clock speeds. Both processors are built on a 12 nm lithography process and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same number of cores, i.e., 8 cores.
The key difference lies in their CPU architecture and clock speeds. The Tiger T610 features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 boasts a slightly faster CPU architecture with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
This difference in clock speeds may result in some performance variation between the two processors. The Tiger T616 may have a slight advantage in CPU-intensive tasks due to its slightly higher clock speed. However, in everyday usage, the difference may not be noticeable to the average user.
Another significant aspect to consider is the thermal design power (TDP), which is the amount of power the processor dissipates as heat. Both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power and generate similar levels of heat when operating at their maximum performance levels.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors offer similar features and performance with subtle differences in clock speeds. The decision between the two will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, as well as the devices they are considering for usage.
The key difference lies in their CPU architecture and clock speeds. The Tiger T610 features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 boasts a slightly faster CPU architecture with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores.
This difference in clock speeds may result in some performance variation between the two processors. The Tiger T616 may have a slight advantage in CPU-intensive tasks due to its slightly higher clock speed. However, in everyday usage, the difference may not be noticeable to the average user.
Another significant aspect to consider is the thermal design power (TDP), which is the amount of power the processor dissipates as heat. Both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power and generate similar levels of heat when operating at their maximum performance levels.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and T616 processors offer similar features and performance with subtle differences in clock speeds. The decision between the two will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, as well as the devices they are considering for usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 614.4 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 June | 2021 |
Partnumber | T610 | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
4
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
6
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Google Tensor G2
7
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
8
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
9
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
10
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 980