Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with varying specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 is equipped with an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T606, this processor has a total of 8 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. However, the T710 stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which adds an enhanced level of neural processing capabilities to the processor.
The comparison between these two processors reveals that they share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, there are distinct differences that set them apart. The T606 has a lower clock speed with 1.6 GHz cores compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz cores, which may result in varying performance levels. Additionally, the T710's inclusion of dual NPUs provides it with an edge in handling neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. If power efficiency and a balanced combination of cores are essential, the T606 may be the preferred option. On the other hand, if enhanced neural processing capabilities and higher clock speeds are desired, the T710 would be more suitable.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 is equipped with an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T606, this processor has a total of 8 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. However, the T710 stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which adds an enhanced level of neural processing capabilities to the processor.
The comparison between these two processors reveals that they share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, there are distinct differences that set them apart. The T606 has a lower clock speed with 1.6 GHz cores compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz cores, which may result in varying performance levels. Additionally, the T710's inclusion of dual NPUs provides it with an edge in handling neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. If power efficiency and a balanced combination of cores are essential, the T606 may be the preferred option. On the other hand, if enhanced neural processing capabilities and higher clock speeds are desired, the T710 would be more suitable.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 16 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 October | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T606 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
2
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 990
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
6
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
8
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888