Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with varying specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 is equipped with an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T606, this processor has a total of 8 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. However, the T710 stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which adds an enhanced level of neural processing capabilities to the processor.
The comparison between these two processors reveals that they share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, there are distinct differences that set them apart. The T606 has a lower clock speed with 1.6 GHz cores compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz cores, which may result in varying performance levels. Additionally, the T710's inclusion of dual NPUs provides it with an edge in handling neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. If power efficiency and a balanced combination of cores are essential, the T606 may be the preferred option. On the other hand, if enhanced neural processing capabilities and higher clock speeds are desired, the T710 would be more suitable.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 is equipped with an architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the T606, this processor has a total of 8 cores. It also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. However, the T710 stands out with its inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which adds an enhanced level of neural processing capabilities to the processor.
The comparison between these two processors reveals that they share similarities in terms of architecture, number of cores, instruction set, and lithography. However, there are distinct differences that set them apart. The T606 has a lower clock speed with 1.6 GHz cores compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz cores, which may result in varying performance levels. Additionally, the T710's inclusion of dual NPUs provides it with an edge in handling neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T606 and Unisoc Tiger T710 would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user. If power efficiency and a balanced combination of cores are essential, the T606 may be the preferred option. On the other hand, if enhanced neural processing capabilities and higher clock speeds are desired, the T710 would be more suitable.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 16 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 October | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T606 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek Helio G96
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
4
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
5
MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Helio G95
6
MediaTek Helio G50 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 2200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
9
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1