Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores. It is built on a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. The CPU architecture of the T618 is divided between two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor is equipped with four cores. It also utilizes a 12 nm lithography and belongs to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Its architecture consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Comparing these two processors, the T618 offers a higher number of cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the T310). It also incorporates a neural processing unit, which can enhance specific AI-related tasks. However, the T310 has a slightly higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz compared to 2.0 GHz in the T618).
Both processors are built on the 12 nm lithography and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making them capable of running modern software and applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T618 stands out with its additional cores and the inclusion of a neural processing unit, which can enhance its performance in AI-related tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores. The specific needs and requirements of the user will determine which processor is a better fit for their intended usage.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores. It is built on a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. The CPU architecture of the T618 is divided between two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor is equipped with four cores. It also utilizes a 12 nm lithography and belongs to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Its architecture consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Comparing these two processors, the T618 offers a higher number of cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the T310). It also incorporates a neural processing unit, which can enhance specific AI-related tasks. However, the T310 has a slightly higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz compared to 2.0 GHz in the T618).
Both processors are built on the 12 nm lithography and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making them capable of running modern software and applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T618 stands out with its additional cores and the inclusion of a neural processing unit, which can enhance its performance in AI-related tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores. The specific needs and requirements of the user will determine which processor is a better fit for their intended usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 10 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 April | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T310 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
5
MediaTek Helio P70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
6
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Helio G90
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
8
Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
10
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100