Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores. It is built on a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. The CPU architecture of the T618 is divided between two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor is equipped with four cores. It also utilizes a 12 nm lithography and belongs to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Its architecture consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Comparing these two processors, the T618 offers a higher number of cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the T310). It also incorporates a neural processing unit, which can enhance specific AI-related tasks. However, the T310 has a slightly higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz compared to 2.0 GHz in the T618).
Both processors are built on the 12 nm lithography and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making them capable of running modern software and applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T618 stands out with its additional cores and the inclusion of a neural processing unit, which can enhance its performance in AI-related tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores. The specific needs and requirements of the user will determine which processor is a better fit for their intended usage.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores. It is built on a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. The CPU architecture of the T618 is divided between two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor is equipped with four cores. It also utilizes a 12 nm lithography and belongs to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Its architecture consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Comparing these two processors, the T618 offers a higher number of cores (8 cores compared to 4 cores in the T310). It also incorporates a neural processing unit, which can enhance specific AI-related tasks. However, the T310 has a slightly higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz compared to 2.0 GHz in the T618).
Both processors are built on the 12 nm lithography and belong to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making them capable of running modern software and applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T618 stands out with its additional cores and the inclusion of a neural processing unit, which can enhance its performance in AI-related tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A55 cores. The specific needs and requirements of the user will determine which processor is a better fit for their intended usage.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 10 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 April | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T310 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
6
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Helio G96
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
8
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio P70
10
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730