Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and Tiger T612 are two processors offered by Unisoc, with each having its own set of specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features an architecture comprised of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 4 cores, this processor is designed to deliver efficient and reliable performance. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm, indicating its fabrication process.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 showcases an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a larger total of 8 cores, this processor offers a potential boost in multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the T310. Like the T310, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and shares the same lithography of 12 nm. In addition, the T612 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency and lower power consumption compared to the T310.
In terms of their key differences, the T612 surpasses the T310 in terms of the number of cores, potentially resulting in improved multitasking and overall performance. Additionally, the T612 boasts a lower TDP, indicating better energy efficiency and reduced power consumption.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers reliable performance with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the Tiger T612 demonstrates enhanced capabilities with its additional cores and improved energy efficiency. The choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and needs of the user, such as multitasking capabilities, power efficiency, and intended usage scenarios.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features an architecture comprised of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 4 cores, this processor is designed to deliver efficient and reliable performance. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm, indicating its fabrication process.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 showcases an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a larger total of 8 cores, this processor offers a potential boost in multitasking capabilities and overall performance compared to the T310. Like the T310, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and shares the same lithography of 12 nm. In addition, the T612 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency and lower power consumption compared to the T310.
In terms of their key differences, the T612 surpasses the T310 in terms of the number of cores, potentially resulting in improved multitasking and overall performance. Additionally, the T612 boasts a lower TDP, indicating better energy efficiency and reduced power consumption.
Overall, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers reliable performance with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the Tiger T612 demonstrates enhanced capabilities with its additional cores and improved energy efficiency. The choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and needs of the user, such as multitasking capabilities, power efficiency, and intended usage scenarios.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 1 |
| Shaders | 32 | 16 |
| DirectX | 10 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 April | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T310 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
MediaTek MT6737 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 7904
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Google Tensor G1
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
8
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Apple A19 Pro