Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and T310 are processors designed by Unisoc. The T610 features 8 CPU cores, while the T310 has 4 cores.
In terms of architecture, the T610 utilizes a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8GHz. On the other hand, the T310 has 1 Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2GHz, along with 3 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8GHz.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering efficient and optimized instructions for software developers.
In regards to lithography, both the T610 and T310 are manufactured using a 12nm fabrication process. This allows for a more power-efficient and compact design compared to older generation processors.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the T610 is stated at 10 Watts, indicating the amount of heat the processor generates under normal operation. Unfortunately, the T310 does not have a specified TDP in the provided specifications.
Based solely on these specifications, it's evident that the T610 offers a higher number of CPU cores compared to the T310. Additionally, the T610's architecture includes more powerful Cortex-A75 cores, whereas the T310 has one Cortex-A75 core at a higher clock speed.
However, it's important to note that these specifications only provide a limited understanding of a processor's performance. Other factors, such as the quality of the chip design and overall system optimization, can also play a significant role in determining performance. Therefore, it's recommended to consult professional reviews or benchmarks for a more detailed comparison of these processors.
In terms of architecture, the T610 utilizes a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8GHz. On the other hand, the T310 has 1 Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2GHz, along with 3 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8GHz.
Both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering efficient and optimized instructions for software developers.
In regards to lithography, both the T610 and T310 are manufactured using a 12nm fabrication process. This allows for a more power-efficient and compact design compared to older generation processors.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the T610 is stated at 10 Watts, indicating the amount of heat the processor generates under normal operation. Unfortunately, the T310 does not have a specified TDP in the provided specifications.
Based solely on these specifications, it's evident that the T610 offers a higher number of CPU cores compared to the T310. Additionally, the T610's architecture includes more powerful Cortex-A75 cores, whereas the T310 has one Cortex-A75 core at a higher clock speed.
However, it's important to note that these specifications only provide a limited understanding of a processor's performance. Other factors, such as the quality of the chip design and overall system optimization, can also play a significant role in determining performance. Therefore, it's recommended to consult professional reviews or benchmarks for a more detailed comparison of these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 10 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 April | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T310 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 2100
2
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
9
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 990
10
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus