Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are both processors produced by Unisoc. While these processors have some similarities, they also have distinct differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This leads to a total of 8 cores, providing powerful performance for various tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has an architecture of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of 4 cores.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are designed for this instruction set.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using a 12 nm process. This helps to optimize power efficiency and performance, allowing for improved overall user experience.
However, there is a notable difference in the TDP (thermal design power) between these two processors. The Unisoc Tiger T606 has a TDP of 10 Watts, which indicates a higher power consumption compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. The TDP value is essential as it determines how much power the processor dissipates and the cooling requirements for the device it is incorporated in.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T606 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are processors that offer different performance capabilities. The T606 has more cores and a higher TDP, potentially providing better multitasking and processing power. The T310, on the other hand, has fewer cores but still utilizes the same instruction set and lithography. In the end, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device it will be used in, considering factors such as power efficiency and desired performance levels.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This leads to a total of 8 cores, providing powerful performance for various tasks. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has an architecture of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of 4 cores.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are designed for this instruction set.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using a 12 nm process. This helps to optimize power efficiency and performance, allowing for improved overall user experience.
However, there is a notable difference in the TDP (thermal design power) between these two processors. The Unisoc Tiger T606 has a TDP of 10 Watts, which indicates a higher power consumption compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. The TDP value is essential as it determines how much power the processor dissipates and the cooling requirements for the device it is incorporated in.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T606 and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are processors that offer different performance capabilities. The T606 has more cores and a higher TDP, potentially providing better multitasking and processing power. The T310, on the other hand, has fewer cores but still utilizes the same instruction set and lithography. In the end, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and needs of the device it will be used in, considering factors such as power efficiency and desired performance levels.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 10 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 April | 2021 October |
Partnumber | T310 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
4
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
6
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
8
Apple A12 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
9
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
10
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821