Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 12 nm lithography, this processor offers a balanced performance and power efficiency. Additionally, it includes a dual NPU for neural processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G comes with a more powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 6 nm lithography, this processor offers higher performance with improved power efficiency. It also includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better power management compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710, which does not specify its TDP. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G could provide longer battery life in devices.
Overall, both processors have the same number of cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling them to handle the same types of tasks. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speed and improved lithography, offering potentially better performance and power efficiency. Additionally, its lower TDP indicates superior power management.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G would depend on the specific needs of the user or device. The Tiger T710 might be suitable for more general-purpose usage, while the Tanggula T770 5G could provide better performance for more demanding applications and 5G connectivity.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 12 nm lithography, this processor offers a balanced performance and power efficiency. Additionally, it includes a dual NPU for neural processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G comes with a more powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 6 nm lithography, this processor offers higher performance with improved power efficiency. It also includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better power management compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710, which does not specify its TDP. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G could provide longer battery life in devices.
Overall, both processors have the same number of cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling them to handle the same types of tasks. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speed and improved lithography, offering potentially better performance and power efficiency. Additionally, its lower TDP indicates superior power management.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G would depend on the specific needs of the user or device. The Tiger T710 might be suitable for more general-purpose usage, while the Tanggula T770 5G could provide better performance for more demanding applications and 5G connectivity.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | |
| Shaders | 96 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
2
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
4
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
5
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
7
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio G96
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
10
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc Tiger T710