Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 12 nm lithography, this processor offers a balanced performance and power efficiency. Additionally, it includes a dual NPU for neural processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G comes with a more powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 6 nm lithography, this processor offers higher performance with improved power efficiency. It also includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better power management compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710, which does not specify its TDP. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G could provide longer battery life in devices.
Overall, both processors have the same number of cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling them to handle the same types of tasks. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speed and improved lithography, offering potentially better performance and power efficiency. Additionally, its lower TDP indicates superior power management.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G would depend on the specific needs of the user or device. The Tiger T710 might be suitable for more general-purpose usage, while the Tanggula T770 5G could provide better performance for more demanding applications and 5G connectivity.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a combination of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a 12 nm lithography, this processor offers a balanced performance and power efficiency. Additionally, it includes a dual NPU for neural processing tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G comes with a more powerful architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 6 nm lithography, this processor offers higher performance with improved power efficiency. It also includes an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better power management compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710, which does not specify its TDP. This suggests that the Tanggula T770 5G could provide longer battery life in devices.
Overall, both processors have the same number of cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling them to handle the same types of tasks. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speed and improved lithography, offering potentially better performance and power efficiency. Additionally, its lower TDP indicates superior power management.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G would depend on the specific needs of the user or device. The Tiger T710 might be suitable for more general-purpose usage, while the Tanggula T770 5G could provide better performance for more demanding applications and 5G connectivity.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
2
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Samsung Exynos 850
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8890
8
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 9609
9
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1