Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer different specifications for various devices.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores, consisting of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an architecture of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm, the Tiger T618 possesses a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also has eight cores, but with a slightly different configuration. This processor consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It shares the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a lower lithography of 6 nm. The T770 5G has a reduced TDP of 5 Watts and also features an NPU.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Tanggula T770 5G has a higher clock speed in its primary core, with a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz compared to the Tiger T618's 2.0 GHz. However, the Tiger T618 has more cores running at the same clock speed, which may result in improved multitasking performance.
Another significant difference lies in the lithography, with the Tanggula T770 5G utilizing a more advanced 6 nm process compared to the Tiger T618's 12 nm. A smaller lithography often leads to improved power efficiency and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, suggesting it might be more power-efficient compared to the Tiger T618's 10 Watt TDP.
Both processors feature NPUs, indicating they possess capabilities for neural processing tasks such as AI and machine learning.
In conclusion, while the Tanggula T770 5G boasts a higher clock speed, lower lithography, and potentially better power efficiency, the Tiger T618 exhibits more cores and a higher TDP. Overall, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the desired device.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, this processor has a total of eight cores, consisting of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an architecture of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm, the Tiger T618 possesses a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G also has eight cores, but with a slightly different configuration. This processor consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It shares the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a lower lithography of 6 nm. The T770 5G has a reduced TDP of 5 Watts and also features an NPU.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Tanggula T770 5G has a higher clock speed in its primary core, with a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz compared to the Tiger T618's 2.0 GHz. However, the Tiger T618 has more cores running at the same clock speed, which may result in improved multitasking performance.
Another significant difference lies in the lithography, with the Tanggula T770 5G utilizing a more advanced 6 nm process compared to the Tiger T618's 12 nm. A smaller lithography often leads to improved power efficiency and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, suggesting it might be more power-efficient compared to the Tiger T618's 10 Watt TDP.
Both processors feature NPUs, indicating they possess capabilities for neural processing tasks such as AI and machine learning.
In conclusion, while the Tanggula T770 5G boasts a higher clock speed, lower lithography, and potentially better power efficiency, the Tiger T618 exhibits more cores and a higher TDP. Overall, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the desired device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
2
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
5
MediaTek Helio P60 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Helio G95
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
8
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 7870
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2