Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with distinct specifications. The Tiger T616 is built with a 12 nm lithography and has a power requirement of 10 Watts. It features an architecture consisting of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In contrast, the Tanggula T770 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 6 nm lithography and has a lower power consumption of 5 Watts. It comprises an architecture that includes 1 Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.5 GHz, 3 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T616, the T770 5G also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable addition in the Tanggula T770 5G is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances the processor's ability to perform AI and machine learning tasks. The Tiger T616, on the other hand, lacks this NPU.
Analyzing these specifications, it is clear that the T770 5G offers a more advanced lithography, resulting in improved power efficiency. The T770 5G also boasts higher clock speeds with its Cortex-A76 cores, enabling faster processing. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI capabilities compared to the Tiger T616.
However, the Tiger T616 may still have its merits. Its higher TDP of 10 Watts suggests potentially higher performance under sustained workloads. Additionally, the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores may offer better single-threaded performance compared to the Cortex-A76 cores in the T770 5G.
Overall, the Tanggula T770 5G appears to be a more modern and efficient processor with its superior lithography, lower power consumption, and inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. However, for certain workloads and specific performance requirements, the Tiger T616 may still be a viable choice.
In contrast, the Tanggula T770 5G is manufactured using a more advanced 6 nm lithography and has a lower power consumption of 5 Watts. It comprises an architecture that includes 1 Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.5 GHz, 3 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T616, the T770 5G also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable addition in the Tanggula T770 5G is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances the processor's ability to perform AI and machine learning tasks. The Tiger T616, on the other hand, lacks this NPU.
Analyzing these specifications, it is clear that the T770 5G offers a more advanced lithography, resulting in improved power efficiency. The T770 5G also boasts higher clock speeds with its Cortex-A76 cores, enabling faster processing. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI capabilities compared to the Tiger T616.
However, the Tiger T616 may still have its merits. Its higher TDP of 10 Watts suggests potentially higher performance under sustained workloads. Additionally, the Tiger T616's Cortex-A75 cores may offer better single-threaded performance compared to the Cortex-A76 cores in the T770 5G.
Overall, the Tanggula T770 5G appears to be a more modern and efficient processor with its superior lithography, lower power consumption, and inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. However, for certain workloads and specific performance requirements, the Tiger T616 may still be a viable choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 1 |
| Shaders | 96 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2021 |
| Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs Apple A9
2
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
3
MediaTek Helio G99 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
4
Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Unisoc T8300