Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, this processor also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. The TDP for the Tanggula T770 5G is 5 Watt, indicating a lower power consumption.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This feature provides an advantage in processing AI algorithms, making the Tanggula T770 5G more suitable for applications that require AI-related computations.
Considering the specifications, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G appears to be more advanced and capable compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612. It has a faster clock speed, a smaller lithography, and the added NPU for improved AI processing. However, the final performance and efficiency of the processors would also depend on other factors such as the software optimization and overall system integration.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, this processor also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. The TDP for the Tanggula T770 5G is 5 Watt, indicating a lower power consumption.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This feature provides an advantage in processing AI algorithms, making the Tanggula T770 5G more suitable for applications that require AI-related computations.
Considering the specifications, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G appears to be more advanced and capable compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612. It has a faster clock speed, a smaller lithography, and the added NPU for improved AI processing. However, the final performance and efficiency of the processors would also depend on other factors such as the software optimization and overall system integration.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 1 |
| Shaders | 96 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
3
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
4
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
5
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 850
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
9
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
10
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680