Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, this processor also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. The TDP for the Tanggula T770 5G is 5 Watt, indicating a lower power consumption.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This feature provides an advantage in processing AI algorithms, making the Tanggula T770 5G more suitable for applications that require AI-related computations.
Considering the specifications, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G appears to be more advanced and capable compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612. It has a faster clock speed, a smaller lithography, and the added NPU for improved AI processing. However, the final performance and efficiency of the processors would also depend on other factors such as the software optimization and overall system integration.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced architecture. It consists of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T612, this processor also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. The TDP for the Tanggula T770 5G is 5 Watt, indicating a lower power consumption.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This feature provides an advantage in processing AI algorithms, making the Tanggula T770 5G more suitable for applications that require AI-related computations.
Considering the specifications, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G appears to be more advanced and capable compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612. It has a faster clock speed, a smaller lithography, and the added NPU for improved AI processing. However, the final performance and efficiency of the processors would also depend on other factors such as the software optimization and overall system integration.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Helio P70
2
Unisoc SC7731E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
3
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
6
Apple A10X Fusion vs Unisoc SC9863A
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Apple A17 Pro
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
10
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Apple A12 Bionic