Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor features four cores with an architecture consisting of one 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T310 is a capable processor suitable for general tasks and moderate usage.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is a more powerful processor. It offers eight cores with an advanced architecture, including one 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A but boasts a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which translates to improved efficiency and lower power consumption. The Tanggula T770 5G has a higher processing power and is better equipped to handle demanding tasks and applications.
Additionally, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better thermal management and energy efficiency compared to the Tiger T310. This makes it suitable for devices that prioritize power conservation and longer battery life.
Another feature that sets the Tanggula T770 5G apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enhances the processor's ability to perform artificial intelligence tasks, enabling features such as improved facial recognition, object detection, and language processing. This makes the Tanggula T770 5G ideal for devices that require AI capabilities, such as smartphones and smart home devices.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of processing power, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T310 remains a suitable choice for less demanding tasks and applications. When choosing between the two processors, it is essential to consider the specific needs and requirements of the device or application.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor features four cores with an architecture consisting of one 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T310 is a capable processor suitable for general tasks and moderate usage.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is a more powerful processor. It offers eight cores with an advanced architecture, including one 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A but boasts a smaller lithography of 6 nm, which translates to improved efficiency and lower power consumption. The Tanggula T770 5G has a higher processing power and is better equipped to handle demanding tasks and applications.
Additionally, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating better thermal management and energy efficiency compared to the Tiger T310. This makes it suitable for devices that prioritize power conservation and longer battery life.
Another feature that sets the Tanggula T770 5G apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enhances the processor's ability to perform artificial intelligence tasks, enabling features such as improved facial recognition, object detection, and language processing. This makes the Tanggula T770 5G ideal for devices that require AI capabilities, such as smartphones and smart home devices.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of processing power, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T310 remains a suitable choice for less demanding tasks and applications. When choosing between the two processors, it is essential to consider the specific needs and requirements of the device or application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 April |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Google Tensor G3
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G70
7
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
8
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
10
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 9611