Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors produced by the same manufacturer, but with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a mixed architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balanced performance with efficient power consumption. With a total of 8 cores, it is suitable for multitasking and handling resource-intensive applications. The processor operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. It has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also follows an octa-core configuration. It employs 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which offers a similar processing capability to the Tiger T612 but with a different distribution. Both processors feature an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have the same lithography of 12 nm. However, what sets the Tanggula T740 5G apart is its additional Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. Therefore, the Tanggula T740 5G is expected to perform better in AI-related applications.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with similar configurations. They both have 8 cores, support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and have a lithography of 12 nm. The main difference lies in the architecture distribution, with the Tanggula T740 5G allocating half its cores to Cortex-A75 and the other half to Cortex-A55. Additionally, the Tanggula T740 5G has an advantage in AI and machine learning tasks thanks to its dual NPU.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a mixed architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balanced performance with efficient power consumption. With a total of 8 cores, it is suitable for multitasking and handling resource-intensive applications. The processor operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. It has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also follows an octa-core configuration. It employs 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, which offers a similar processing capability to the Tiger T612 but with a different distribution. Both processors feature an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and have the same lithography of 12 nm. However, what sets the Tanggula T740 5G apart is its additional Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. Therefore, the Tanggula T740 5G is expected to perform better in AI-related applications.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with similar configurations. They both have 8 cores, support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, and have a lithography of 12 nm. The main difference lies in the architecture distribution, with the Tanggula T740 5G allocating half its cores to Cortex-A75 and the other half to Cortex-A55. Additionally, the Tanggula T740 5G has an advantage in AI and machine learning tasks thanks to its dual NPU.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 4.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.75 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 1 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
8
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio P65
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc SC7731E