Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T606
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are two processors with slightly different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This eight-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. In terms of power consumption, the Tiger T606 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also has eight cores, but with a slightly different CPU architecture. It offers 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T606, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has the same lithography of 12 nm. However, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its neural processing capabilities, featuring dual neural processing units (NPUs).
Comparing the two processors, the primary difference lies in their CPU architectures. The Tiger T606 has a higher number of 1.6 GHz cores, specifically six Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multi-threaded performance in certain applications. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers four Cortex-A75 cores, which operate at a slightly higher clock speed of 1.8 GHz, potentially resulting in better single-threaded performance.
Additionally, the Tanggula T740 5G's highlight is its dual NPU, which can provide accelerated AI processing tasks. This feature can greatly benefit applications that heavily rely on artificial intelligence algorithms and neural networks.
In summary, while both processors have similar lithography, instruction set, and number of cores, their differences in CPU architecture and the presence of dual NPUs make them suitable for different use cases. The Tiger T606 may excel in multi-threaded applications, while the Tanggula T740 5G can be advantageous for AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements of the desired application or device.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This eight-core processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. In terms of power consumption, the Tiger T606 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also has eight cores, but with a slightly different CPU architecture. It offers 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T606, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has the same lithography of 12 nm. However, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its neural processing capabilities, featuring dual neural processing units (NPUs).
Comparing the two processors, the primary difference lies in their CPU architectures. The Tiger T606 has a higher number of 1.6 GHz cores, specifically six Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multi-threaded performance in certain applications. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G offers four Cortex-A75 cores, which operate at a slightly higher clock speed of 1.8 GHz, potentially resulting in better single-threaded performance.
Additionally, the Tanggula T740 5G's highlight is its dual NPU, which can provide accelerated AI processing tasks. This feature can greatly benefit applications that heavily rely on artificial intelligence algorithms and neural networks.
In summary, while both processors have similar lithography, instruction set, and number of cores, their differences in CPU architecture and the presence of dual NPUs make them suitable for different use cases. The Tiger T606 may excel in multi-threaded applications, while the Tanggula T740 5G can be advantageous for AI-related tasks. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements of the desired application or device.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 16 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 4.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.75 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 1 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | T606 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio G70
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
8
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835