Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with similar specifications, but some notable differences. Let's compare these two processors based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G has a total of 8 cores with a combination of 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G also has 8 cores, but with a different configuration. It consists of 1 Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.5 GHz, 3 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors have ARMv8.2-A, which is a modern instruction set architecture providing support for features like virtualization and security enhancements.
The Tanggula T740 5G utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G comes with a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), while the Tanggula T770 5G features a single NPU. Neural Processing Units are specialized hardware that accelerates AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing the overall performance in these areas.
One additional distinction is the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the processors. The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the T740 5G specification does not mention the TDP.
In conclusion, both processors have similar core counts, instruction sets, and neural processing capabilities. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its more advanced 6 nm lithography and lower TDP, which suggests better power efficiency. The specific use case and requirements will determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G has a total of 8 cores with a combination of 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Tanggula T770 5G also has 8 cores, but with a different configuration. It consists of 1 Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.5 GHz, 3 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors have ARMv8.2-A, which is a modern instruction set architecture providing support for features like virtualization and security enhancements.
The Tanggula T740 5G utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Tanggula T770 5G has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A lower lithography generally indicates a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G comes with a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), while the Tanggula T770 5G features a single NPU. Neural Processing Units are specialized hardware that accelerates AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing the overall performance in these areas.
One additional distinction is the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the processors. The Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the T740 5G specification does not mention the TDP.
In conclusion, both processors have similar core counts, instruction sets, and neural processing capabilities. However, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its more advanced 6 nm lithography and lower TDP, which suggests better power efficiency. The specific use case and requirements will determine which processor would be the most suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 4.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.75 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 1 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio P95
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
5
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Apple A10 Fusion
6
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G95
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P90
10
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tiger T606