Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's delve into their details to compare them.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, all based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 28 nm, the SC9863A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 3 Watts. Additionally, it comes equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities in AI processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 presents an architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and an identical number of 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. Like the SC9863A, the T710 possesses 8 cores built on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, what sets it apart is its 12 nm lithography, which offers a more efficient power management. Furthermore, the Tiger T710 stands out with its dual Neural Processing Units (NPUs), enabling improved AI processing capabilities.
While both processors share the same number of cores and instruction set, they differ in terms of clock speeds, lithography, and AI capabilities. The SC9863A operates at slightly lower clock speeds (1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz) compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz across all cores. However, the SC9863A compensates with its lower TDP of 3 Watts, which indicates better power efficiency.
The Tiger T710, with its smaller 12 nm lithography, enhances power management, potentially leading to improved performance and energy efficiency compared to the SC9863A's 28 nm lithography.
Additionally, the Tiger T710 outshines the SC9863A by offering dual NPUs, enabling better AI processing performance. These NPUs enhance the T710's ability to handle AI-related tasks, making it a more suitable choice for applications reliant on artificial intelligence.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T710 surpasses the SC9863A in terms of clock speeds, lithography, power efficiency, and AI processing capabilities. However, certain factors, such as budget and specific use cases, should be considered when selecting a processor, as they may influence the final decision.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, all based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 28 nm, the SC9863A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 3 Watts. Additionally, it comes equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities in AI processing.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 presents an architecture that includes 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and an identical number of 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. Like the SC9863A, the T710 possesses 8 cores built on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, what sets it apart is its 12 nm lithography, which offers a more efficient power management. Furthermore, the Tiger T710 stands out with its dual Neural Processing Units (NPUs), enabling improved AI processing capabilities.
While both processors share the same number of cores and instruction set, they differ in terms of clock speeds, lithography, and AI capabilities. The SC9863A operates at slightly lower clock speeds (1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz) compared to the T710's 1.8 GHz across all cores. However, the SC9863A compensates with its lower TDP of 3 Watts, which indicates better power efficiency.
The Tiger T710, with its smaller 12 nm lithography, enhances power management, potentially leading to improved performance and energy efficiency compared to the SC9863A's 28 nm lithography.
Additionally, the Tiger T710 outshines the SC9863A by offering dual NPUs, enabling better AI processing performance. These NPUs enhance the T710's ability to handle AI-related tasks, making it a more suitable choice for applications reliant on artificial intelligence.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T710 surpasses the SC9863A in terms of clock speeds, lithography, power efficiency, and AI processing capabilities. However, certain factors, such as budget and specific use cases, should be considered when selecting a processor, as they may influence the final decision.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2019 |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
2
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
3
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
4
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G35
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Samsung Exynos 990
7
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Helio G25
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200