Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T700 processors, there are several key specifications to consider.
Starting with the architecture, the SC9863A features a 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, whereas the Tiger T700 has a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 setup. This means that the Tiger T700 has a more powerful primary core with the Cortex-A75, which may offer better performance in certain tasks.
Both processors operate with 8 cores, meaning they have the same level of parallel processing capabilities.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility and support for modern software and applications.
Another aspect to consider is the lithography, which refers to the manufacturing process used to create the processors. The SC9863A has a lithography of 28 nm, while the Tiger T700 offers a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Generally, a smaller lithography allows for better power efficiency and performance.
The TDP, or thermal design power, is another specification to take into account. The SC9863A has a TDP of 3 watts, while the Tiger T700 has a TDP of 10 watts. A lower TDP generally indicates better power efficiency.
Lastly, the SC9863A includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can enhance AI and machine learning tasks. However, no such information is provided for the Tiger T700.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T700 processors have some notable differences in their specifications. While the SC9863A offers a higher number of cores and an NPU for improved AI capabilities, the Tiger T700 features a more powerful primary core, a smaller lithography, and potentially better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
Starting with the architecture, the SC9863A features a 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, whereas the Tiger T700 has a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 setup. This means that the Tiger T700 has a more powerful primary core with the Cortex-A75, which may offer better performance in certain tasks.
Both processors operate with 8 cores, meaning they have the same level of parallel processing capabilities.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility and support for modern software and applications.
Another aspect to consider is the lithography, which refers to the manufacturing process used to create the processors. The SC9863A has a lithography of 28 nm, while the Tiger T700 offers a smaller lithography of 12 nm. Generally, a smaller lithography allows for better power efficiency and performance.
The TDP, or thermal design power, is another specification to take into account. The SC9863A has a TDP of 3 watts, while the Tiger T700 has a TDP of 10 watts. A lower TDP generally indicates better power efficiency.
Lastly, the SC9863A includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can enhance AI and machine learning tasks. However, no such information is provided for the Tiger T700.
In conclusion, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T700 processors have some notable differences in their specifications. While the SC9863A offers a higher number of cores and an NPU for improved AI capabilities, the Tiger T700 features a more powerful primary core, a smaller lithography, and potentially better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2021 March |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
3
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 1280
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
5
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
8
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
9
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Samsung Exynos 9820