Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors with distinct specifications. Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In total, it has 8 cores. The instruction set utilized by this processor is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 28 nm. The thermal design power (TDP) is 3 watts, indicating relatively low power consumption. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that aids in processing tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T618 boasts an architecture comprising 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it has 8 cores. The instruction set supported by this processor is ARMv8.2-A, but it differentiates itself with a smaller lithography, measuring 12 nm. This smaller lithography results in improved power efficiency and performance as compared to the SC9863A. However, this improvement comes at the cost of a higher TDP, which stands at 10 watts. Additionally, like the SC9863A, the Tiger T618 is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to enhance its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, while both processors offered by Unisoc exhibit eight cores and an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ significantly in terms of clock speeds, lithography, TDP, and power consumption. The SC9863A features a lower performance with its 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, accompanied by a moderately low TDP of 3 watts and a 28 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 excels in performance with its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, but sacrifices slightly higher power consumption with a TDP of 10 watts due to its 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on one's specific needs and requirements.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T618 boasts an architecture comprising 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it has 8 cores. The instruction set supported by this processor is ARMv8.2-A, but it differentiates itself with a smaller lithography, measuring 12 nm. This smaller lithography results in improved power efficiency and performance as compared to the SC9863A. However, this improvement comes at the cost of a higher TDP, which stands at 10 watts. Additionally, like the SC9863A, the Tiger T618 is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to enhance its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In summary, while both processors offered by Unisoc exhibit eight cores and an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ significantly in terms of clock speeds, lithography, TDP, and power consumption. The SC9863A features a lower performance with its 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, accompanied by a moderately low TDP of 3 watts and a 28 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 excels in performance with its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, but sacrifices slightly higher power consumption with a TDP of 10 watts due to its 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on one's specific needs and requirements.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2019 August |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P65 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
3
Unisoc SC7731E vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
4
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
6
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 1330
8
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
9
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720