Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T616 processors are both high-performance processors with varying specifications.
The Unisoc SC9863A has a CPU architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz - Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz - Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The processor is made using a 28 nm lithography and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts. An interesting feature of this processor is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its processing capabilities for tasks that require artificial intelligence or machine learning capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 has a different CPU architecture. It consists of 2x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T616 is made using a more advanced 12 nm lithography. This means that it is more power-efficient and can handle tasks more efficiently compared to the SC9863A. The TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 10 watts.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T616 processors have similar core counts and instruction sets. However, they differ in their CPU architectures, lithography, TDP, and power efficiency. The SC9863A has a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores whereas the Tiger T616 has two powerful Cortex-A75 cores. The SC9863A has a lower lithography of 28 nm while the Tiger T616 is built on a more advanced 12 nm lithography, making it more power-efficient. The TDP for SC9863A is lower at 3 watts, indicating lower power consumption. Overall, the Tiger T616 offers better performance and efficiency due to its higher clock speeds and advanced lithography.
The Unisoc SC9863A has a CPU architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz - Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz - Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The processor is made using a 28 nm lithography and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts. An interesting feature of this processor is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its processing capabilities for tasks that require artificial intelligence or machine learning capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 has a different CPU architecture. It consists of 2x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T616 is made using a more advanced 12 nm lithography. This means that it is more power-efficient and can handle tasks more efficiently compared to the SC9863A. The TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 10 watts.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T616 processors have similar core counts and instruction sets. However, they differ in their CPU architectures, lithography, TDP, and power efficiency. The SC9863A has a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores whereas the Tiger T616 has two powerful Cortex-A75 cores. The SC9863A has a lower lithography of 28 nm while the Tiger T616 is built on a more advanced 12 nm lithography, making it more power-efficient. The TDP for SC9863A is lower at 3 watts, indicating lower power consumption. Overall, the Tiger T616 offers better performance and efficiency due to its higher clock speeds and advanced lithography.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 128 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 November | 2021 |
| Partnumber | SC9863A | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
2
Google Tensor G4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
3
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G96
5
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
6
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
7
Unisoc T820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
8
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
9
MediaTek MT6739 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek Helio G36