Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc SC9863A and the Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors that come with their own set of specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features a CPU architecture with 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates the size of the transistors used in the manufacturing process. With a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 3 watts, it is designed to consume low power. Additionally, it is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T610 sports an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it also has 8 cores, but with a different distribution. It shares the same instruction set as the SC9863A, which is the ARMv8.2-A. However, the T610 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, implying a more advanced manufacturing process. Consequently, it has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating a higher power consumption level compared to the SC9863A.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in terms of their CPU architectures, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities. The SC9863A balances power and efficiency with its 4x 1.6 GHz and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, 28 nm lithography, and 3W TDP. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 emphasizes performance with its 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, 12 nm lithography, and higher 10W TDP. The choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the intended usage scenario.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features a CPU architecture with 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm, which indicates the size of the transistors used in the manufacturing process. With a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 3 watts, it is designed to consume low power. Additionally, it is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its artificial intelligence capabilities.
In comparison, the Unisoc Tiger T610 sports an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the SC9863A, it also has 8 cores, but with a different distribution. It shares the same instruction set as the SC9863A, which is the ARMv8.2-A. However, the T610 has a smaller lithography of 12 nm, implying a more advanced manufacturing process. Consequently, it has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating a higher power consumption level compared to the SC9863A.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they differ in terms of their CPU architectures, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities. The SC9863A balances power and efficiency with its 4x 1.6 GHz and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, 28 nm lithography, and 3W TDP. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 emphasizes performance with its 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, 12 nm lithography, and higher 10W TDP. The choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the intended usage scenario.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2019 June |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs MediaTek Helio G36
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8895
8
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio G25
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G