Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T310 are both processors produced by Unisoc, but they have some distinct differences in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it is built on a 28nm lithography and features a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture consists of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another set of 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.2 GHz. This processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts. Moreover, the SC9863A also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), specifically designed to handle neural network computation tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 is manufactured using a more advanced 12nm lithography process. It comes with a total of 4 CPU cores, comprising 1 Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and 3 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. Similar to the SC9863A, this processor also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it lacks a dedicated NPU.
In terms of performance, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has the advantage of a more advanced lithography process, which generally implies better power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The presence of the Cortex-A75 core also indicates better single-threaded performance compared to the SC9863A. However, the SC9863A compensates for these differences with its higher number of CPU cores and the inclusion of an NPU, which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements of the use case. If power efficiency and single-threaded performance are crucial, the Tiger T310 may be the better choice. However, if multi-threaded performance and AI capabilities are more important, the SC9863A might be the preferred option. Overall, both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses, providing options for different application scenarios.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it is built on a 28nm lithography and features a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture consists of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another set of 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.2 GHz. This processor supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts. Moreover, the SC9863A also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), specifically designed to handle neural network computation tasks.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 is manufactured using a more advanced 12nm lithography process. It comes with a total of 4 CPU cores, comprising 1 Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and 3 Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. Similar to the SC9863A, this processor also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it lacks a dedicated NPU.
In terms of performance, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has the advantage of a more advanced lithography process, which generally implies better power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The presence of the Cortex-A75 core also indicates better single-threaded performance compared to the SC9863A. However, the SC9863A compensates for these differences with its higher number of CPU cores and the inclusion of an NPU, which can greatly enhance AI and machine learning tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements of the use case. If power efficiency and single-threaded performance are crucial, the Tiger T310 may be the better choice. However, if multi-threaded performance and AI capabilities are more important, the SC9863A might be the preferred option. Overall, both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses, providing options for different application scenarios.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2019 April |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 8895
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Helio G37
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 980
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
9
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Apple A11 Bionic
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio G90