Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc SC9832E and the Unisoc Tiger T710 are two different processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a quad-core CPU architecture with 4x Cortex-A53 cores, each operating at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 showcases a more advanced architecture. It has an octa-core CPU architecture with 4x Cortex-A75 cores and 4x Cortex-A55 cores. Each core has a clock speed of 1.8 GHz. It operates on the more recent ARMv8.2-A instruction set architecture. The Tiger T710 is built on a smaller 12 nm lithography process, which generally translates to lower power consumption and improved efficiency. Additionally, it features Dual Neural Processing Units (NPU), highlighting its capabilities for artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T710 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of CPU architecture, number of cores, and instruction set. Its octa-core design, featuring Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, provides better processing capabilities and potential for multitasking. The 12 nm lithography process offers improved power efficiency and the inclusion of Dual NPU enhances AI performance. However, it is important to note that these specifications are just a part of the comparison. Real-world performance, power efficiency, and other factors may also come into play when evaluating the processors.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a quad-core CPU architecture with 4x Cortex-A53 cores, each operating at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor is built on a 28 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set architecture.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 showcases a more advanced architecture. It has an octa-core CPU architecture with 4x Cortex-A75 cores and 4x Cortex-A55 cores. Each core has a clock speed of 1.8 GHz. It operates on the more recent ARMv8.2-A instruction set architecture. The Tiger T710 is built on a smaller 12 nm lithography process, which generally translates to lower power consumption and improved efficiency. Additionally, it features Dual Neural Processing Units (NPU), highlighting its capabilities for artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T710 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of CPU architecture, number of cores, and instruction set. Its octa-core design, featuring Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, provides better processing capabilities and potential for multitasking. The 12 nm lithography process offers improved power efficiency and the inclusion of Dual NPU enhances AI performance. However, it is important to note that these specifications are just a part of the comparison. Real-world performance, power efficiency, and other factors may also come into play when evaluating the processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 4 | |
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T710 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Apple A18
2
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
4
Apple M4 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T616
6
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
8
Apple A19 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
9
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Samsung Exynos 9610