Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a quad-core architecture with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a more advanced architecture with a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It utilizes a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Tiger T618 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 clearly offers more power and flexibility with its octa-core arrangement and higher clock speeds. The combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores allows for efficient multitasking and better performance in demanding applications. Moreover, the inclusion of the NPU further enhances the Tiger T618's capabilities in AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that the Unisoc SC9832E may have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency due to its lower TDP and older 28 nm lithography. This could make it a suitable choice for devices that prioritize battery life over raw processing power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T618 appears to be a more powerful and feature-rich processor compared to the SC9832E. However, the suitability of each processor will depend on the intended use, energy efficiency needs, and budget constraints of the device or system it will be used in.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a quad-core architecture with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a more advanced architecture with a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It utilizes a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Tiger T618 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 clearly offers more power and flexibility with its octa-core arrangement and higher clock speeds. The combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores allows for efficient multitasking and better performance in demanding applications. Moreover, the inclusion of the NPU further enhances the Tiger T618's capabilities in AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that the Unisoc SC9832E may have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency due to its lower TDP and older 28 nm lithography. This could make it a suitable choice for devices that prioritize battery life over raw processing power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T618 appears to be a more powerful and feature-rich processor compared to the SC9832E. However, the suitability of each processor will depend on the intended use, energy efficiency needs, and budget constraints of the device or system it will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 4 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T618 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Apple A16 Bionic
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
5
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Helio G70
6
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P90
8
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
9
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
10
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 1280