Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T618
VS
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a quad-core architecture with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a more advanced architecture with a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It utilizes a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Tiger T618 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 clearly offers more power and flexibility with its octa-core arrangement and higher clock speeds. The combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores allows for efficient multitasking and better performance in demanding applications. Moreover, the inclusion of the NPU further enhances the Tiger T618's capabilities in AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that the Unisoc SC9832E may have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency due to its lower TDP and older 28 nm lithography. This could make it a suitable choice for devices that prioritize battery life over raw processing power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T618 appears to be a more powerful and feature-rich processor compared to the SC9832E. However, the suitability of each processor will depend on the intended use, energy efficiency needs, and budget constraints of the device or system it will be used in.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a quad-core architecture with 4 Cortex-A53 cores running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a more advanced architecture with a combination of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. It utilizes a 12 nm lithography and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, the Tiger T618 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 clearly offers more power and flexibility with its octa-core arrangement and higher clock speeds. The combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores allows for efficient multitasking and better performance in demanding applications. Moreover, the inclusion of the NPU further enhances the Tiger T618's capabilities in AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that the Unisoc SC9832E may have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency due to its lower TDP and older 28 nm lithography. This could make it a suitable choice for devices that prioritize battery life over raw processing power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T618 appears to be a more powerful and feature-rich processor compared to the SC9832E. However, the suitability of each processor will depend on the intended use, energy efficiency needs, and budget constraints of the device or system it will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 2 |
| Shaders | 4 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 64M |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2019 August |
| Partnumber | T618 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
2
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Helio P70
5
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Apple A12 Bionic
7
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
10
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300