Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T616

The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them side by side.

In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the SC9832E features a quad-core setup, with each core clocked at 1.4 GHz using the Cortex-A53 architecture. On the other hand, the Tiger T616 boasts an octa-core configuration, combining two high-performing Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz. This disparity in core count and architecture allows the Tiger T616 to potentially handle more demanding tasks and processes.

Both processors utilize the ARMv8 instruction set, which is known for its advanced technology and compatibility with modern applications. However, the Tiger T616 further enhances performance with its support for ARMv8.2-A instruction set, possibly enabling it to efficiently execute complex tasks.

In terms of lithography, the SC9832E is manufactured using a 28 nm process, while the Tiger T616 is built on a more advanced 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally implies better power efficiency and potentially improved overall performance.

Power consumption is an important consideration in processor selection. The SC9832E has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts, indicating relatively lower power consumption. In comparison, the Tiger T616 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting slightly higher power requirements.

It is clear from the specifications that the Tiger T616 outperforms the SC9832E in several aspects. With its octa-core architecture, support for ARMv8.2-A instruction set, smaller lithography, and potentially increased power, it can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved efficiency. However, the SC9832E may still have its advantages, such as lower power consumption and potentially lower cost.

In conclusion, while both processors have their strengths, the Tiger T616 stands out as the more capable and advanced option, especially for users seeking optimal performance and efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on individual needs and considerations.

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 4 8
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 28 nm 12 nm
TDP 7 Watt 10 Watt

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 2 GB up to 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 667 MHz 1866 MHz
Memory-bus 2x16 bit


Storage specification eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.1


GPU name Mali-T820 MP1 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Architecture Midgard Bifrost
GPU frequency 680 MHz 750 MHz
Execution units 1 1
Shaders 4 16
DirectX 11 11
OpenCL API 1.2 2.1
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.2

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 1440x720 2400x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 13MP 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP
Max Video Capture FullHD@30fps FullHD@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC) H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)


4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.15 Gbps 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.05 Gbps 0.1 Gbps
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 4.2 5.0
Satellite navigation BeiDou

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2018 2021
Partnumber T616
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Low-end Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Tiger T616

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Tiger T616

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Tiger T616