Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 28 nm lithography with four CPU cores running at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. These cores are based on the Cortex-A53 architecture and utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set. The TDP, or thermal design power, of the SC9832E is 7 Watts.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T610, it boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography. It has a total of eight CPU cores, including two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. The instruction set used by the T610 is ARMv8.2-A. Compared to the SC9832E, the T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of CPU architecture, the T610 is more powerful than the SC9832E. The Cortex-A75 cores offer better performance and efficiency compared to the Cortex-A53 cores found in the SC9832E. Additionally, the inclusion of six Cortex-A55 cores in the T610 provides further performance enhancements.
One area where the SC9832E holds an advantage is the manufacturing process. With a 28 nm lithography, it is more power-efficient than the T610's 12 nm lithography. This is reflected in the lower TDP of the SC9832E, as it consumes less power.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 outperforms the SC9832E in terms of CPU architecture and overall processing power. However, the SC9832E has the advantage of being more power-efficient due to its higher lithography. The choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device or application they are intended for.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 28 nm lithography with four CPU cores running at a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. These cores are based on the Cortex-A53 architecture and utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set. The TDP, or thermal design power, of the SC9832E is 7 Watts.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T610, it boasts a more advanced 12 nm lithography. It has a total of eight CPU cores, including two Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. The instruction set used by the T610 is ARMv8.2-A. Compared to the SC9832E, the T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of CPU architecture, the T610 is more powerful than the SC9832E. The Cortex-A75 cores offer better performance and efficiency compared to the Cortex-A53 cores found in the SC9832E. Additionally, the inclusion of six Cortex-A55 cores in the T610 provides further performance enhancements.
One area where the SC9832E holds an advantage is the manufacturing process. With a 28 nm lithography, it is more power-efficient than the T610's 12 nm lithography. This is reflected in the lower TDP of the SC9832E, as it consumes less power.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 outperforms the SC9832E in terms of CPU architecture and overall processing power. However, the SC9832E has the advantage of being more power-efficient due to its higher lithography. The choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device or application they are intended for.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 2 |
| Shaders | 4 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | T610 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 1580
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 8890
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
9
MediaTek Helio A22 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T310