Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T606
VS
The Unisoc SC9832E and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is a quad-core processor with a clock speed of 1.4GHz. It uses the Cortex-A53 architecture and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. The lithography of this processor is 28nm, and it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 is an octa-core processor with a more advanced architecture. It has two high-performance Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6GHz. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8.2-A. It boasts a lower lithography of 12nm, which indicates a more efficient and power-saving design. The TDP of the Tiger T606 is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
Comparing the two processors, the Tiger T606 clearly stands out in terms of the number of cores and its architecture. With eight cores and a combination of high-performance and energy-efficient cores, it offers better multitasking capabilities and improved power efficiency compared to the SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the lithography. The Tiger T606 uses a 12nm process, which is more advanced than the 28nm process used in the SC9832E. This results in better power efficiency and potentially higher performance in the Tiger T606.
In terms of raw clock speed, the SC9832E has a slightly lower clock speed at 1.4GHz compared to the 1.6GHz of the Tiger T606. However, it is important to note that clock speed alone is not the sole determinant of performance. The architecture and efficiency of the processor also play significant roles.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T606 appears to be a more advanced and capable processor compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. With its eight cores, improved architecture, and lower lithography, it offers better performance and power-efficiency, making it a viable choice for more demanding tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is a quad-core processor with a clock speed of 1.4GHz. It uses the Cortex-A53 architecture and has an instruction set of ARMv8-A. The lithography of this processor is 28nm, and it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 is an octa-core processor with a more advanced architecture. It has two high-performance Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6GHz. The instruction set of this processor is ARMv8.2-A. It boasts a lower lithography of 12nm, which indicates a more efficient and power-saving design. The TDP of the Tiger T606 is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
Comparing the two processors, the Tiger T606 clearly stands out in terms of the number of cores and its architecture. With eight cores and a combination of high-performance and energy-efficient cores, it offers better multitasking capabilities and improved power efficiency compared to the SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the lithography. The Tiger T606 uses a 12nm process, which is more advanced than the 28nm process used in the SC9832E. This results in better power efficiency and potentially higher performance in the Tiger T606.
In terms of raw clock speed, the SC9832E has a slightly lower clock speed at 1.4GHz compared to the 1.6GHz of the Tiger T606. However, it is important to note that clock speed alone is not the sole determinant of performance. The architecture and efficiency of the processor also play significant roles.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T606 appears to be a more advanced and capable processor compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. With its eight cores, improved architecture, and lower lithography, it offers better performance and power-efficiency, making it a viable choice for more demanding tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | T606 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Apple A17 Pro
2
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
3
MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
4
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 980
8
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Google Tensor G2
9
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 850