Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with varying specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a quad-core architecture with 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The thermal design power (TDP) of the SC9832E is 7 Watts.
In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G takes a more powerful approach. It employs an octa-core architecture with a combination of cores: 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This provides a range of performance capabilities for different tasks. The instruction set supported by the processor is ARMv8.2-A. The Tanggula T770 5G utilizes a more advanced lithography process of 6 nm, which typically translates to improved power efficiency. It operates with a TDP of 5 Watts. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities in the form of an NPU, which can enhance the device's performance in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Comparing these two processors, it is clear that the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offers higher performance potential with its octa-core architecture, particularly with its Cortex-A76 cores. Additionally, the use of a more advanced lithography process and the inclusion of an NPU make the Tanggula T770 5G a more advanced and efficient processor. However, it is worth noting that the SC9832E may still prove suitable for less demanding tasks or budget-oriented devices due to its lower power consumption.
Overall, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage. If high performance and advanced AI capabilities are essential, the Tanggula T770 5G would be the recommended choice. On the other hand, if power efficiency and budget constraints are priorities, the SC9832E could still be a viable option.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a quad-core architecture with 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The thermal design power (TDP) of the SC9832E is 7 Watts.
In contrast, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G takes a more powerful approach. It employs an octa-core architecture with a combination of cores: 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This provides a range of performance capabilities for different tasks. The instruction set supported by the processor is ARMv8.2-A. The Tanggula T770 5G utilizes a more advanced lithography process of 6 nm, which typically translates to improved power efficiency. It operates with a TDP of 5 Watts. Additionally, it includes Neural Processing capabilities in the form of an NPU, which can enhance the device's performance in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Comparing these two processors, it is clear that the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G offers higher performance potential with its octa-core architecture, particularly with its Cortex-A76 cores. Additionally, the use of a more advanced lithography process and the inclusion of an NPU make the Tanggula T770 5G a more advanced and efficient processor. However, it is worth noting that the SC9832E may still prove suitable for less demanding tasks or budget-oriented devices due to its lower power consumption.
Overall, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage. If high performance and advanced AI capabilities are essential, the Tanggula T770 5G would be the recommended choice. On the other hand, if power efficiency and budget constraints are priorities, the SC9832E could still be a viable option.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 32 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 6 |
| Shaders | 4 | 96 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio P22
2
Apple M3 (iPad) vs Apple A10 Fusion
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
8
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 2600
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
10
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821