Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture based on Cortex-A7 cores. The CPU operates at a frequency of 1.3 GHz, making it suitable for basic tasks. With an ARMv7-A instruction set, it supports the execution of instructions optimized for this architecture. The lithography process for this processor is 28 nm, which means it is manufactured on a 28-nanometer chip. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the SC7731E is 7 Watts, indicating its power consumption level.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 offers an advancement in specifications. It incorporates a more powerful architecture, consisting of two Cortex-A75 cores operating at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core setup allows for multitasking and handles more demanding tasks with increased efficiency. Furthermore, the instruction set is upgraded to ARMv8.2-A, enabling improved performance and compatibility with newer software. The lithography process of the Tiger T618 is 12 nm, indicating a more advanced chip fabrication technology compared to the SC7731E. Moreover, with a TDP of 10 Watts, it consumes slightly more power than its counterpart. Notably, the Tiger T618 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities to perform AI-related tasks and optimizations.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC7731E offers a basic quad-core setup with a lower clock speed and older architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 presents a more advanced octa-core configuration with faster cores, an upgraded instruction set, and additional AI capabilities. The Tiger T618's 12 nm lithography process also represents a more modern manufacturing technology. Consequently, for users seeking more power and performance for multitasking, resource-demanding applications, and handling AI-related tasks, the Tiger T618 would be the preferable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture based on Cortex-A7 cores. The CPU operates at a frequency of 1.3 GHz, making it suitable for basic tasks. With an ARMv7-A instruction set, it supports the execution of instructions optimized for this architecture. The lithography process for this processor is 28 nm, which means it is manufactured on a 28-nanometer chip. Additionally, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the SC7731E is 7 Watts, indicating its power consumption level.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 offers an advancement in specifications. It incorporates a more powerful architecture, consisting of two Cortex-A75 cores operating at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. This octa-core setup allows for multitasking and handles more demanding tasks with increased efficiency. Furthermore, the instruction set is upgraded to ARMv8.2-A, enabling improved performance and compatibility with newer software. The lithography process of the Tiger T618 is 12 nm, indicating a more advanced chip fabrication technology compared to the SC7731E. Moreover, with a TDP of 10 Watts, it consumes slightly more power than its counterpart. Notably, the Tiger T618 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities to perform AI-related tasks and optimizations.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC7731E offers a basic quad-core setup with a lower clock speed and older architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 presents a more advanced octa-core configuration with faster cores, an upgraded instruction set, and additional AI capabilities. The Tiger T618's 12 nm lithography process also represents a more modern manufacturing technology. Consequently, for users seeking more power and performance for multitasking, resource-demanding applications, and handling AI-related tasks, the Tiger T618 would be the preferable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 4 | 32 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T618 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
3
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
4
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
5
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
6
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P60
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Google Tensor G1
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662