Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc SC7731E and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP (Thermal Design Power).
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T612 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
2
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Apple M2 (iPad)
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
4
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
5
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G100
6
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
7
Apple M4 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
8
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
9
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
10
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960