Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc SC7731E and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP (Thermal Design Power).
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 1 |
Shaders | 4 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T612 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A16 Bionic
3
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
4
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Helio G90
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs Apple A10 Fusion
7
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P95
9
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G80
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B