Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc SC7731E and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP (Thermal Design Power).
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU cores. It has a total of 4 cores and an instruction set of ARMv7-A. The SC7731E is built on a 28 nm lithography, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. Its TDP is 7 Watts, which indicates the maximum amount of power it can consume.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 differs in various aspects. It boasts a more advanced architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 CPU cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 CPU cores. This results in a total of 8 cores. The Tiger T612 features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is newer compared to the SC7731E. Additionally, it is built on a more efficient 12 nm lithography, meaning it offers better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T612 is slightly higher at 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T612 surpasses the SC7731E in terms of architecture, as it combines powerful Cortex-A75 cores with energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. It also benefits from a more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller 12 nm lithography, enhancing its overall performance and power efficiency. However, it should be noted that the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E's 7 Watts. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T612 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7420
2
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Apple A11 Bionic
4
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
8
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
10
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Apple A15 Bionic