Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors that boast different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, this processor features a 4-core architecture, specifically the Cortex-A7, which runs at a frequency of 1.3 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set and has a lithography process of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the SC7731E is relatively low at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 offers more advanced specifications compared to the SC7731E. The T610 features a more efficient architecture, with 2 high-performance Cortex-A75 cores running at a frequency of 1.8 GHz, accompanied by 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making it more advanced in terms of instruction execution. The lithography process of the T610 is 12 nm, which is smaller compared to the SC7731E, resulting in potentially better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T610 is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of specifications. It features a more advanced architecture with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. Additionally, the T610 utilizes a more modern ARM instruction set and has a smaller lithography process, which can contribute to better power efficiency. However, it is worth noting that a higher TDP may imply that the T610 may consume more power.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, this processor features a 4-core architecture, specifically the Cortex-A7, which runs at a frequency of 1.3 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set and has a lithography process of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the SC7731E is relatively low at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 offers more advanced specifications compared to the SC7731E. The T610 features a more efficient architecture, with 2 high-performance Cortex-A75 cores running at a frequency of 1.8 GHz, accompanied by 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.8 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, making it more advanced in terms of instruction execution. The lithography process of the T610 is 12 nm, which is smaller compared to the SC7731E, resulting in potentially better power efficiency. The TDP of the Tiger T610 is slightly higher at 10 Watts.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 surpasses the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of specifications. It features a more advanced architecture with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. Additionally, the T610 utilizes a more modern ARM instruction set and has a smaller lithography process, which can contribute to better power efficiency. However, it is worth noting that a higher TDP may imply that the T610 may consume more power.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 2 |
| Shaders | 4 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | T610 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
3
MediaTek MT6739 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
7
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Apple A19
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G