Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc Tiger T606 are both processors from the same company, but they have notable differences in terms of their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture with four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. The CPU cores are based on the ARMv7-A instruction set and have a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz with six Cortex-A55 cores, also clocked at 1.6 GHz. In total, it offers eight CPU cores. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is more advanced than ARMv7-A used in the SC7731E. The Tiger T606 also benefits from a smaller lithography of 12 nm, meaning it can pack more transistors into a smaller space. However, a consequence of this is a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc SC7731E is a quad-core processor with a lower clock speed, older architecture, larger lithography, and lower TDP. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a more advanced architecture, higher clock speed, smaller lithography, and a higher TDP. These specifications suggest that the Tiger T606 is likely to offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the SC7731E. However, the specific use case and requirements should be considered when making a decision about which processor is more suitable for a given application.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture with four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. The CPU cores are based on the ARMv7-A instruction set and have a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watts, indicating its power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz with six Cortex-A55 cores, also clocked at 1.6 GHz. In total, it offers eight CPU cores. The processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is more advanced than ARMv7-A used in the SC7731E. The Tiger T606 also benefits from a smaller lithography of 12 nm, meaning it can pack more transistors into a smaller space. However, a consequence of this is a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the SC7731E.
In summary, the Unisoc SC7731E is a quad-core processor with a lower clock speed, older architecture, larger lithography, and lower TDP. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features a more advanced architecture, higher clock speed, smaller lithography, and a higher TDP. These specifications suggest that the Tiger T606 is likely to offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the SC7731E. However, the specific use case and requirements should be considered when making a decision about which processor is more suitable for a given application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | T606 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A11 Bionic vs Apple A17 Pro
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Helio G100
3
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
Apple M2 (iPad) vs Apple A9
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
7
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
10
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3