Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors that are worth comparing in terms of their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core Cortex-A7 architecture, with each core clocked at 1.3 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography and has a total thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. It operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A boasts a more advanced architecture. It features four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz, making it an octa-core processor. With a 28 nm lithography and a TDP of 3 Watts, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable feature that sets the Unisoc SC9863A apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This allows for accelerated artificial intelligence tasks and improves the overall performance of the processor when handling machine learning algorithms or AI-based applications. The Unisoc SC7731E does not have this NPU capability.
In terms of core count, the Unisoc SC9863A clearly has the advantage with its eight cores compared to the four cores of the Unisoc SC7731E. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A's architecture is more advanced, as it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, compared to the ARMv7-A of the SC7731E.
However, it is important to note that both processors are built on the same 28 nm lithography, which may affect their power efficiency and heat dissipation. The Unisoc SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, which suggests that it may be more power-efficient compared to the Unisoc SC7731E with its 7 Watt TDP.
Overall, while both processors have their unique features and advantages, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out for its increased core count, advanced architecture, and the inclusion of the NPU for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core Cortex-A7 architecture, with each core clocked at 1.3 GHz. This processor is built on a 28 nm lithography and has a total thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. It operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A boasts a more advanced architecture. It features four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz, making it an octa-core processor. With a 28 nm lithography and a TDP of 3 Watts, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable feature that sets the Unisoc SC9863A apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This allows for accelerated artificial intelligence tasks and improves the overall performance of the processor when handling machine learning algorithms or AI-based applications. The Unisoc SC7731E does not have this NPU capability.
In terms of core count, the Unisoc SC9863A clearly has the advantage with its eight cores compared to the four cores of the Unisoc SC7731E. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A's architecture is more advanced, as it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, compared to the ARMv7-A of the SC7731E.
However, it is important to note that both processors are built on the same 28 nm lithography, which may affect their power efficiency and heat dissipation. The Unisoc SC9863A has a lower TDP of 3 Watts, which suggests that it may be more power-efficient compared to the Unisoc SC7731E with its 7 Watt TDP.
Overall, while both processors have their unique features and advantages, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out for its increased core count, advanced architecture, and the inclusion of the NPU for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 4 |
Shaders | 4 | 128 |
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | SC9863A | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Google Tensor G3
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
3
Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Google Tensor G5
5
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
6
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc T8300
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
9
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
10
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek MT6739