Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 9609

VS

Which processor is better? We compared Samsung Exynos 2600 with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Exynos 2600

Exynos 9609

253579

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Exynos 2600

3455

Exynos 9609

353

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Exynos 2600

11621

Exynos 9609

1154

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro	4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
Number of cores	10	8
Instruction Set	ARMv9.3-A	ARMv8-A
Lithography	2 nm	10 nm
Number of transistors		3000 million
TDP		9 Watt
Neural Processing	AI engine with 32K MAC NPU	NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 24 GB	up to 4 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR4X
Memory frequency		1600 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x32 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name	Xclipse 960	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Architecture	RDNA	Mali Bifrost
GPU frequency	985 MHz	850 MHz
Execution units		3
Shaders		48
DirectX	12.1
OpenCL API	2.0	2.0
OpenGL API		ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.4	1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	2560x1600
Max camera resolution	1x 320MP	1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
Max Video Capture	8K@30fps	4K@120fps
Video codec support	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	14.79 Gbps	0.6 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed		0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi	7 (802.11be)	5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth	6.0	5.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS