Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 9611

VS
Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime)
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold)
1x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver)
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Number of transistors 3000 million
TDP 5 Watt 8 Watt
Neural Processing Qualcomm Hexagon 696 NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 12 GB up to 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory-bus 2x16 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 620 Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
GPU frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 3 3
Shaders 192 48
DirectX 12
OpenCL API 2.0 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.1 1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 2520x1080 2560x1600
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Max Video Capture 4K@30fps 4K@120fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 3.7 Gbps 0.6 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 1.6 Gbps 0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS
SBAS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2020 Quarter 2 2019 Quarter 3
Partnumber SM7250-AC S5E9611
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Mid-end Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Snapdragon 768G
441857
Exynos 9611
243759

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Snapdragon 768G
704
Exynos 9611
364

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Snapdragon 768G
1988
Exynos 9611
1088