Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime) 1x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver) |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Qualcomm Hexagon 696 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 620 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Qualcomm Adreno 600 | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 12 |
| Shaders | 192 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2400 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 3.7 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | SM7250-AA | S5E9825 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
3
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
Apple A16 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
8
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675