Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

VS

Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 with Samsung Exynos 2500. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Snapdragon 695

394145

Exynos 2500

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Snapdragon 695

694

Exynos 2500

2653

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Snapdragon 695

1993

Exynos 2500

9901

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 660 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 660 Silver)	1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925 5x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A725 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Number of cores	8	10
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv9.2-A
Lithography	6 nm	3 nm
TDP	4 Watt
Neural Processing	Qualcomm Hexagon 686	NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 8 GB	up to 24 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5X
Memory frequency	2133 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory-bus	2x16 bit	4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 2.2

Graphics

GPU name	Adreno 619	Xclipse 950
GPU Architecture	Qualcomm Adreno 600	RDNA
GPU frequency	950 MHz	1300 MHz
Execution units	2	8
Shaders	128
DirectX	12	12.1
OpenCL API	2.0	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.1	1.4

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	2520x1080	3840x2160
Max camera resolution	1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max Video Capture	FullHD@60fps	8K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	2.5 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	1.5 Gbps
Wi-Fi	5 (802.11ac)	7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS