Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

VS

Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 with Samsung Exynos 2500. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Snapdragon 632

144893

Exynos 2500

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Snapdragon 632

263

Exynos 2500

2653

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Snapdragon 632

1048

Exynos 2500

9901

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 250 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 250 Silver)	1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925 5x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A725 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Number of cores	8	10
Instruction Set	ARMv8-A	ARMv9.2-A
Lithography	14 nm	3 nm
Number of transistors	2000 million
TDP	5 Watt
Neural Processing	Qualcomm Hexagon 546	NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 8 GB	up to 24 GB
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR5X
Memory frequency	933 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory-bus	2x16 bit	4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

eMMC 5.1

Graphics

GPU name	Adreno 506	Xclipse 950
GPU Architecture	Qualcomm Adreno 500	RDNA
GPU frequency	650 MHz	1300 MHz
Execution units	1	8
Shaders	96
DirectX	12	12.1
OpenCL API	2.0	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.1
Vulkan API	1.0	1.4

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	1920x1200	3840x2160
Max camera resolution	1x 40MP, 2x 13MP
Max Video Capture	4K@30fps	8K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi	4 (802.11n)	7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth	5.0	5.4
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS