MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
2
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
6
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
9
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus