MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
2
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
4
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
9
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Helio G80