MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight cores. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable feature of the Unisoc Tiger T710 is its dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities in AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 930, it boasts an architecture of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also adding up to eight cores in total. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of the more advanced 6 nm lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. Another noteworthy aspect is its TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts.
In terms of Neural Processing, the Unisoc Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU, allowing for accelerated AI tasks. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 features an NPU but does not specify whether it is single or dual.
Both processors offer eight cores and support the same instruction set, ensuring compatibility and ease of use. The key differences arise in terms of architecture, lithography process, TDP, and Neural Processing capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 utilizes the more advanced 6 nm process. This distinction in lithography results in improved power efficiency for the Dimensity 930.
To summarize, while both processors have their own strengths and capabilities, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 presents an advantage in terms of power efficiency with its 6 nm lithography process. Both processors offer support for eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing users with efficient and compatible performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
3
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
5
Apple A10 Fusion vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
6
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
8
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Helio P65