MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications. Starting with the design architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 integrates 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores in total.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors boast the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. However, the Unisoc Tiger T618 is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of a more advanced 6 nm lithography process.
In terms of power efficiency, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power under normal operating conditions. Additionally, both processors feature a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables them to handle complex artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T618 in terms of performance capabilities due to its more powerful Cortex-A78 cores and advanced 6 nm lithography process. However, the Unisoc Tiger T618 cannot be disregarded, as its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores provide a solid performance foundation. Both processors offer compatibility, power efficiency, and neural processing capabilities, making them suitable choices for a range of devices, from smartphones to smart home appliances.
When it comes to the instruction set, both processors boast the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. However, the Unisoc Tiger T618 is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 takes advantage of a more advanced 6 nm lithography process.
In terms of power efficiency, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they consume a similar amount of power under normal operating conditions. Additionally, both processors feature a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables them to handle complex artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T618 in terms of performance capabilities due to its more powerful Cortex-A78 cores and advanced 6 nm lithography process. However, the Unisoc Tiger T618 cannot be disregarded, as its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores provide a solid performance foundation. Both processors offer compatibility, power efficiency, and neural processing capabilities, making them suitable choices for a range of devices, from smartphones to smart home appliances.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T618 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
4
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
5
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 850
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Google Tensor G2
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460