MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that are utilized in mobile devices. While both processors offer efficient performance, they differ in several aspects.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tiger T616 features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. It consists of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 boasts Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores. It comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 930 provides a slightly higher clock speed, which suggests better overall performance.
Both processors contain 8 cores in total, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities. Additionally, they possess the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which allows for powerful and versatile operations.
In terms of lithography, the Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm process, while the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. This difference in lithography indicates that the Dimensity 930 is more power-efficient and may generate less heat during extended usage.
Another notable distinction lies in the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is present in the Dimensity 930 but absent in the Tiger T616. The addition of the NPU enables enhanced AI processing, resulting in improved performance in various AI-related tasks.
Regarding the power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates that they have a similar power consumption profile.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 offers a more advanced lithography, higher clock speed, and the added benefit of an NPU for enhanced AI processing. However, the Unisoc Tiger T616 still provides a solid performance with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the intended application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tiger T616 features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. It consists of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 boasts Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores. It comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 930 provides a slightly higher clock speed, which suggests better overall performance.
Both processors contain 8 cores in total, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities. Additionally, they possess the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which allows for powerful and versatile operations.
In terms of lithography, the Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm process, while the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. This difference in lithography indicates that the Dimensity 930 is more power-efficient and may generate less heat during extended usage.
Another notable distinction lies in the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is present in the Dimensity 930 but absent in the Tiger T616. The addition of the NPU enables enhanced AI processing, resulting in improved performance in various AI-related tasks.
Regarding the power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates that they have a similar power consumption profile.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 offers a more advanced lithography, higher clock speed, and the added benefit of an NPU for enhanced AI processing. However, the Unisoc Tiger T616 still provides a solid performance with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the intended application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 |
Partnumber | T616 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
2
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
5
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
6
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
7
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Google Tensor G3
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G35
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810